Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 08:57
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What is Opec+ up to? - Financial Times
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
This Quirky Accessory Can Actually Make Walking Easier And Boost Heart Health - HuffPost
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Would you join a gym or workout at home and why?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why don't I get sleep at nights?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
T.J. Oshie, the Caps’ beloved ‘warrior,’ announces his NHL retirement - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Young researcher’s ALS attack plan is now a no-go - Harvard Gazette
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.